*Please proceed with the optimization of advertisements based on data. As for the ad format, the ‘Collection’ is excellent again from Traffic Campaign Inverted results from A/B test and advertising results The effects of advertising materials are generally similar to performance exposure
[Test A, Test B Results] Ad Settings Ad (material, format) setting
1. (Plan A) Traffic campaign_Ad format 4 (image, video, slide, collection)
2. (Plan B) Traffic campaign_Ad format 1 (collection)
Ad running period (May 21, 2024 ~ May 30, 2024) Setting cost: 15RM Exposure location: Advantage+Location
Text
1. 😍Find an online advertising agency quickly!
2. ❤️Find a marketing agency quickly!
3. 🎶Find a marketing agency quickly!
4. 🗣Find a global marketing agency quickly!
5. 😁Find an advertising agency quickly!
Ad material Image Video Slide (created using image) Collection (set main as video, next as image) [A/B Test Result] Goal Version Performance Cost per Result Result Reach Exposure Expenditure Confidence Level Traffic (A) 2024-05-07| Traffic | 4 ads Lose 1.47 29 945 1,799 42.70 MYR 13% Traffic (B) 2024-05-06| Traffic | 1 ads Win 0.80 64 1,083 2,065 51.06 MYR 87% *The above graph is a figure obtained using the Meta (Facebook) A/B test function. A confidence level of 90% or more means statistically reliable results, and a confidence level of 65% or more means good performance. The above figure is an estimate and does not guarantee the causative result of the study. Results: 87% reliability and better for '4 advertising materials' [Comparison of previous A/B test results ] Goal Version Performance Cost per Result Result Reach Exposure Expenditure Confidence Level Traffic (A) 2024-05-07| Traffic | 4 ads Win 1.22 219 125000 18344 267.02 MYR 86% Traffic (B) 2024-05-06| Traffic | 1 ads Lose 1.7 94 107000 20058 159.86 MYR 14% Goal Version Performance Cost per Result Result Reach Exposure Expenditure Confidence Level Traffic (A) 2024-05-16| Traffic | 4 ads Win 0.81 119 2,489 4,733 96.68 MYR 86% Traffic (B) 2024-05-16| Traffic | 1 ads Lose 1.14 74 1,828 3,726 84.72 MYR 14% Goal Version Performance Cost per Result Result Reach Exposure Expenditure Confidence Level Traffic (A) 2024-05-16| Traffic | 4 ads Lose 1.47 29 945 1,799 42.70 MYR 13% Traffic (B) 2024-05-16| Traffic | 1 ads Win 0.80 64 1,083 2,065 51.06 MYR 87% Results Previous tests showed that using 4 ad creatives led to better results, while in this test, using 1 ad creative led to better results. The cost per win difference between Test B and C is only 0.01. The cost per win for the winning items in Test A was 126 won higher than in the optimized Tests B and C. Test B had a confidence level of 86%, while Test C had a confidence level of 87%. In Test A, the CPC decreased to 0.90 in the CPC results from April 27th to May 9th, after the A/B test period and optimization.
[Comparison of Ad Sets] Ad Set Exposure Reach Link Clicks Clicks (Total) Result CTR CPC CPM (Plan A) 4 Ad Materials 33,553 16,695 658 655 658 1.95% RM1.04 RM20.35 (Plan B) 1 Ad Material 20,473 12,820 97 123 97 0.60% RM1.34 RM8.03 Ad Set Exposure Reach Link Clicks Clicks (Total) Result CTR CPC CPM (Plan A) 4 Ad Materials 4,743 2,496 119 118 119 2.49% RM0.82 RM20.39 (Plan B) 1 Ad Material 3,727 1,829 74 72 74 1.93% RM1.18 RM22.74 Ad Set Exposure Reach Link Clicks Clicks (Total) Result CTR CPC CPM (Plan A) 4 Ad Materials 4,821 2,461 93 93 93 1.93% RM1.11 RM21.34 (Plan B) 1 Ad Material 4,634 2,235 120 118 120 2.55% RM0.86 RM21.84 Results The highest collection performance CPR for 'Test C' was 2.72% in B, and 2.55% in C test The Plan B (1 ad creative) of 'Test C' had a 0.62% higher CTR compared to the Plan A (4 ad creatives) / The difference was minimal with a 0.01% decrease from the previous 'Test B campaign' CTR The Plan B (1 ad creative) of 'Test C' was 75 won cheaper in CPC compared to the Plan A (4 ad creatives) / The difference was minimal with a 3 won increase from the previous ad set While there was no significant difference in CTR, the 'Test A', 'Test B', and 'Test C' all showed that the 'A Plan with 4 ad creatives' had the highest impressions, indicating that the 'number of ad creatives' seems to influence the impression volume Impression volume ratio by test Test A: Plan A (62%) / Plan B (37%) - Spending around 254,100 won Test B: Plan A (56%) / Plan B (44%) - Spending around 54,438 won Test C: Plan A (49%) / Plan B (51%) - Spending around 61,227 won [Ad Comparison] Ad Format Exposure Reach Link Clicks Clicks (Total) Result CTR CPC CPM Video 45 45 - - - - - RM25.78 Collection 4,466 2,113 93 93 93 2.08% RM1.06 RM98.88 Slide 310 303 - - - - - RM9.23 Image - - - - - - - - Ad Format Exposure Reach Link Clicks Clicks (Total) Result CTR CPC CPM Image 4,634 2,235 120 118 120 2.55% RM0.86 RM21.84 Results In the case of 'Plan A (4 ad creatives)', it is possible to confirm the part that was focused on and exposed to a specific ad (collection). Looking at 'Plan A (4 ad creatives)', 'video', 'collection', and 'slide' were all exposed, but the results only occurred in the 'collection'. Comparing 'Plan A (4 ad creatives)' and 'Plan B (1 ad creative)', although they have the same 'collection', the CTR is about 0.47 and the CPC is about 60 won different / the previous values (CTR 0.79, CPC 108 won difference) occurred. In all the test results, the 'collection' was significantly superior in all cases. Both 'Test B, C' had similar exposure values for both the excellent ad set and the non-excellent ad set. In 'Test B ad creative 4 (Plan A)', the CTR is 2.72%, and the CPC is RM0.82. In 'Test B ad creative 1 (Plan B)', the CTR is 1.93% and the CPC is RM1.18. In 'Test C ad creative 4 (Plan A)', the CTR is 2.08% and the CPC is RM1.06. In 'Test C ad creative 1 (Plan B)', the CTR is 2.55% and the CPC is RM0.86. [Uniqueness by Text] 💡 Text-analyzed video, low or low result data in image advertising format, impossible to measure (Image performance: click x, video performance: click 1) [Exposure Location] Test B (Collection) Exposure Reach Outocme CTR CPC CPM Audience Network (Native, Banner and Full screen)_Plan A 3,456 1,599 99 2.84% RM0.83 RM23.45 Audience Network (Rewarded Video)_Plan A 610 325 13 2.13% RM0.74 RM15.77 Audience Network (Native, Banner and Full screen)_Plan B 2,925 1,481 66 2.19% RM1.13 RM24.63 Audience Network (Rewarded Video)_Plan B 732 363 8 1.09% RM1.47 RM16.05 Test C (Collection) Exposure Reach Outocme CTR CPC CPM Audience Network (Native, Banner and Full screen)_Plan A 3,570 1,798 86 2.41% RM1.02 RM24.67 Audience Network (Rewarded Video)_Plan A 883 362 7 0.79% RM1.53 RM12.10 Audience Network (Native, Banner and Full screen)_Plan B 3,776 1,914 110 2.86% RM0.83 RM23.83 Audience Network (Rewarded Video)_Plan B 845 365 10 1.18% RM1.09 RM12.95 Results In all test results, the ‘Audience Network (Native, Banner and Full screen)’, ‘Audience Network (Rewarded Video)’ placement highest exposure. In all test results, the 'Audience Network (Rewarded Video)' placement showed negligible results compared to the exposure.